|
Posted by Jim Higson on 04/26/06 13:42
darksaga wrote:
> hmm,
> could be the serverversion, have to ask the admin tomorrow what version
> we are using exactly.
>
> why is it that insane to send over 2GB via http?
I suppose it probably isn't. It sure feels counter-intuative to use a web
browser as heavy-duty data mover though.
You know your needs better than I, and I can't easily think of any other
way, though so well done for thinking outside the box!
> - its fast (constant upload speeds >10MB/s)
> - its userfriendly (browse button --> browse to file; upload button
> -->upload file (during upload u get a nice progress view (see:
> http://www.freeware-base.de/freeware-base-artikel11663.html)
> - files are only temporally on the server (user does the upload; user
> starts computation; user get result via mail; afterwards files are
> deleted; whole process normally < 24h)
> - if i use ftp, my cgi script will be more complex (i could be wrong @
> that point, due i'm pretty new to perl&cgi)
>
> greets
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|