|
|
Posted by robert on 04/26/06 17:46
| > wow...you got pissy fast.
|
| It's a gift.
how terribly witty of you.
| > | The best tool for the job is the one that doe the job as required.
| >
| > i can put a nail in a plank with the heel of my shoe...wanna rethink
that?
|
| If the shoe works now whereas a obtaining a hammer would delay the project
| use the shoe, I am results oriented i.e. just get the job done. One my
| favourite sayings is "a good plan today is better than a perfect plan
| tomorrow"
you have a project? and one with deadlines, of all things? I KNOW
YOU...you're the guy i hear about when i take a new job! "yeah, he was a
bonehead...that's why he's gone! he strung a bunch of shit together that ran
like a dog and at the end of the day, was still a bunch of shit...what we
need you to do is start from scratch, doing it right the first time."
what you've seemed to miss in you bethrothal to conventional wisdom and
ejaculation of cliche after cliche is that to meet the requirement of your
last, you must first *HAVE* a good plan.
| > | Thanks for telling me what you think the best solution is ??
| >
| > advice is free and getting some may get someone to rethink
| > stategy...although some here (read, you) find advice offensible and as a
| > plight of self-importance and subjugation.
|
| As stated above I seek results, I asked a question, you responded yet
still
| failed to answer my original question...
hmmm...again in your rush to be affronted, you missed everthing of
benefit...allow me to repost my FIRST comment:
"i've done plenty of com work in php
and have only had few occassions where
it was rough."
now i know you hold great distain for assumption thereby negate the validity
of discernment and inference...so, let me spell that out to you...
YES, IT CAN BE DONE!
i suppose you're the reason the media and authorship in general all consider
their audience to read at an 8th grade level at best. thanks for that.
| I did not ask what a better way was, I asked a specific question.
and i answered it...sorry you're illiteracy got in your way.
| > | The process presently works and works well, read the OP and you'll see
| > what
| > | I actually asked, you may find this information useful in answering
the
| > | question.
| >
| > oh, i read it...can't dream of anyone paying someone to architect that
as
| > a
| > viable solution.
|
| That's nice...
more wit? you are a smart one!
| but then again, i wasn't going there. i was offering a
| > suggestion and nothing more.
|
| An answer to the original question would have been appropriate.
sorry you didn't get the affirmation you needed based on what you read. but
as i pointed out, it simply wasn't communicated to you at the proper level
of literacy. ;^)
| > yeah, i got that. had you not been so patronized by my suggestion, you
| > could
| > simply do away with 3 supporting cogs in your desire to parse and store
| > html. and, since you are already familiar with sql server and com, i
would
| > think you'd be greatful to know that...and had you behaved, i may have
| > given
| > you the source code to do all that within sql server...problem solved
and
| > solution provided as freely as the advice i gave.
|
| Thanks but no thanks, Is that a type of newgroup spanking ? lol
| Let me reiterate... I don't want your suggestions or your solutions. I
asked
| a specific question and only want an answer to that
well...you got both...but i suspect you're not used to going beyond
expectation...and probably have difficulty in simply reaching it. further,
if you just wanted a yes/no answer then a heart-felt RTFM would have been in
order and a comment about "have you ever head of google, you twit?" would
have been fair to throw about as well. again i gave you the benefit of the
doubt - errr....means i assumed again.
as for the spanking...what you do on your time and in the privacy of your
own world is your business. i neither have the time nor inclination. what i
was suggesting is that when burning bridges, it is most advantageous for you
if you actually *cross the bridge* first. ;^)
| > first let me say this regarding conventional wisdom. it is simply
| > convenient
| > and rarely wise and the term was coined as a damnation of this oxymoron
| > (people are more likely to believe even what is false as long as it is
| > more
| > palatible than other alternatives). assumption can also be equated to
| > discernment - which is how all of our knowlege advances.
| >
| > further, i reiterate that i cannot imagine anyone paying for such a
| > solution...hence the next logical thesis which i believe i stated
fairly.
|
| Let me reiterate. That's nice...
poignant, sententious, and well-expressed...i must say, you *are* quite
impressively mentally statured.
| > perhaps my first suggestion(s) came off as offensive. i can accept that
as
| > part of the drawback of communicating in this medium. it was not my
| > intention. it would have been nice to have been offered a chance to
| > clarify
| > my intentions...would have been.
| >
| > oh well.
| >
| >
|
| Yeah and I want world peace too...
tsk, tsk, tsk. i'll have to immediately revise my optimism in regard to
thinking the populous en masse is more intelligent than most give credit.
and just so we're clear...my previous posts were not meant to offend
you...you *should* read this one with the same ignorance and face-valued
approach that lead you to that conclusion of the former posts. that way you
will understand that this one *is* meant to be insulting.
*PLONK*
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|