|
|
Posted by Bruce Grubb on 04/28/06 04:34
In article <1146154059.724696.239450@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
"Andy Dingley" <dingbat@codesmiths.com> wrote:
> Bruce Grubb wrote:
>
> > Except not all that subset is compliant with the standard.
>
> It's a subset. Therefore (for a standard of this form, for a subset
> that's still valid against the DTD) it's still compliant itself.
>
> > Conditional comments is one such example
>
> Conditional comments aren't part of the standard, therefore they're not
> part of a subset.
>
> Of course "things that look exactly like conditional comments, but
> aren't interpretable as anything other then static SGML comments" _are_
> part of the standard and would also remain a part of most sensible
> subsets. They don't mean anything special though, they're just comments
> (and anything placed between pairs of them is likely to find itself
> getting parsed as HTML).
>
> > as show in the "very very sad: most browsers
> > are broken :(" thread <http://tinyurl.com/qbhsx>
>
> I bet you have a little list of these ancient bookmarks don't you?
No I know how to do this thing called RESEARCH. Try it some time.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|