|
|
Posted by Bruce Grubb on 11/24/66 11:46
In article
<doraymeRidThis-64E541.13243530042006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article <4bhap4F11i20dU1@individual.net>,
> Dave Hinz <DaveHinz@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:58:50 +1000, dorayme
> > <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au>
> > wrote:
> > > In article <4bel5sF10l1rlU2@individual.net>,
> > > Dave Hinz <DaveHinz@spamcop.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> How in the world is pointing out that implementations differ, giving
> > >> _anyone_ a bad name? News flash; he's right, _and_, he couldn't "give
> > >> Mac users a bad name" regardless of what he says or who he is.
> >
> > > You need to go deeper into the thread to see this. IE Mac is
> > > basically irrelevant to the trouble with IE. The whole thing
> > > started with Bruce Grubb saying silly things about not needing to
> > > worry about making special provisions for IE.
> >
> > If that's what you really think he's been saying, you haven't ben
> > reading carefully.
>
> What is he trying to say David?
If you don't knww by now then there is little hope of learning at this late
date.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|