|
|
Posted by ironcorona on 05/03/06 19:26
Andy Dingley <dingbat@codesmiths.com> wrote:
> With reservations, I don't dislike it particularly as a tutorial.
> However the real "reference" for CSS is simply the real W3C
> recommendation. It's not always the most accessible reading, but it's
> canonical and it's free.
Yeah, I agree. But they've made it a bit hard to search for specific
pieces of information. The only time I *really* need to look at the
actual spec is when I want to find out the default values for certain
rules. eg. What the spec says the box model should look like versus
what IE says it should look like :) etc.
I have a sneaky suspicion that they could do with a graphics designer
over there at the W3C and probably a user interface expert too. I mean,
yeah, it's perfectly valid but a nightmare to slog through.
--
ironcorona
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|