|
|
Posted by Jake on 05/06/06 22:12
In message <445cc6a3$0$3700$cb0e7fc6@news.centralva.net>, Jonathan N.
Little <lws4art@centralva.net> writes
>Jake wrote:
>> In message <8e3ti3-rjn.ln1@ophelia.g5n.co.uk>, Toby Inkster
>><usenet200605@tobyinkster.co.uk> writes
>>> Jake wrote:
>>>> David Dorward writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Author's page, but user's browser.
>>>>
>>>> Exactly. Author's page -- so author gets to choose.
>>>
>>> User's browser -- so user gets to choose.
>>>
>> If you can override the author's design decision, well -- good for you.
>>
>>> Should a newspaper publisher be able to choose to make sure all
>>>readers
>>> hold the paper in their left hand, hold it a specific distance from their
>>> face, fold it in a particular way, and so forth? If I've bought a
>>> newspaper, I'll read it any way I bloody like.
>> And do you walk into the publisher's office and tell him he can't
>>produce his newspaper in a certain size, with a specific typestyle,
>>etc. No? I thought not.
>>
>>>
>>
>
>That is the point you are missing, a webpage is *not* a printed page.
>
Nor is a radio or TV broadcast. Your point?
--
Jake (jake@gododdin.demon.co.uk -- just a 'spam trap' mail address)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|