|
|
Posted by Jaxtraw on 05/08/06 02:26
JDS wrote:
> On Sun, 07 May 2006 23:29:43 +0100, Jaxtraw wrote:
>
>> It singularly fails to be
>> better than tables.
>
> What? All of what you said is a load of bullshit. Sorry. Not being
> defensive, just stating it like it is.
>
> CSS is better for tables, but not necessarily for the reasons you
> stated. One can create horrid, bad, unfluid designs using CSS, yes,
> but CSS is still better than using tables. And the reason has
> nothing to do with the designs themselves. It has to do with the
> fundamental difference between what tables were intended to be used
> for and what CSS was intended to be used for.
Really? That's it? A technology can only be used for what it was originally
intended to be used for?
Okay. Better shut down the web then. The internet wasn't originally intended
to be used for that.
CSS is great as a styling rules system. As a layout system, it doesn't work.
But then, CSS was never originally intended for layout anyway, was it?
Ian
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|