|
|
Posted by Chaddy2222 on 05/09/06 12:49
dorayme wrote:
> In article
> <1147146871.855219.196440@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
> "Chaddy2222" <rockradio2000@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > Michael Laplante wrote:
> > > "Jim Moe" <jmm-list.AXSPAMGN@sohnen-moe.com> wrote in message
> > > news:xaKdnS8GE_Y5BMLZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@giganews.com...
> > > > Michael Laplante wrote:
> > >
> > > > Accessibility and fluid design are not bound to each other.
>
> Depends what is meant by "bound".
>
> >>> Fixed width designs are as accessible as fluid designs.
> > >
>
> Any site chosen at random, would not be more accessible by being
> modified to be not so constrained? Doubt it. A person who wanted
> the viewport to be utilised more (due, for example, to his
> eyesight) might easily find it more easier to use.
>
> > No...... Fluid design = good design!.....
>
> This is just obviously false. It is like saying that a site that
> validates must be well designed.
Hmmmm, the point I was trying to make was that a site thet re-sizes
well and that works on a range of browsers is generally well designed.
But, yes, I agree with the point that their is a lot more to a design
working well then it being able to be re-sized ok.
Their is a lot more to this regarding web accessibility as well, items
such as a user being able to use his or her color schemes etc etc, or
even just makeing the color scheme of the site good so everything is
readable.
I actually think chooseing colours for the web is offen one of the
hardest tasks with web design.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.cjb.cc
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|