|
|
Posted by dorayme on 09/26/34 11:17
> From: dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au>
>> From: JohnWMpls <johnwfa@mn.rr.com>
>
>> A year or so ago I started using MS Word 2003 to read .doc files people
>> sent me - to save as HTML for posting. Files sizes ballooned - full of
>> css stuff. I went back to using MS Word 98 for this - nice clean HTML
>> code. {g}
>
>
> There are one or two docs for which I have used MS Word 98 to get a rough
> HTML layout for and it is a mess. But a *much better mess* to clean up than
> with later MS Words... So, I sort of agree with you, seriously.
I should add, I suppose, that I agree with comments by others (now that I
have read them) that css is not at fault so much as the crazy use of it in
later MS Word. To tell the truth, 98 is better because one can then css
style the "cleaner" html that you see in a more rational manner.
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|