|
|
Posted by Jim Moe on 11/24/50 11:47
Charles Sweeney wrote:
>
> Plenty of CSS die-hards use tables for layout. Don't worry about it!
> Jim Moe does too here:
> http://sohnen-moe.com/whoweare.php
> (Do as I say, not as I do.)
>
LOL! Yes, there are a few places where that happens. They sidestep the
limitations of Internet Explorer and maintain the look of the site. Its
original incarnation was massively table-based, six deep in some places.
>
> Just as someone who is interested in Jim's terms of service, won't be
> bothered by the fact that the link is presented in a table.
>
Hmm. It's tabular data.
Or is it? Would a definition list work better? No, semantically bogus.
How about an unordered list? No, there are two aspects: name and value.
Lists are one dimensional, not two.
It's one of those fuzzy areas. I have never decided that using a table
was the best choice. Then, of course, there was whole issue with IE and
block element centering... <sigh>
--
jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
(Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|