|
|
Posted by Quentin Ran on 10/02/34 11:47
Dave, I feel you should read Kimberly L. Tripp's response more carefully.
Her response is quite to the point. The performance comparison is not based
on the same number of physical disks, it is based on the same drive
capacity, using the same physical drives, but different number of them. Of
course if measured by basing on the same number of physical drives, you will
get the performance number as you stated, but that is just not the way
currently used to assess the performance.
"Dave" <daveg.01@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1147443352.693450.119150@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> In theory, should this happen? Does anyone know of any published
> benchmarks that compare Raid 5 to Raid 10 while holding the number of
> disks constant?
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|