|
|
Posted by robert on 05/15/06 21:00
"JDS" <jeffrey@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.05.15.17.06.34.661121@example.invalid...
| On Mon, 15 May 2006 11:46:59 -0500, robert wrote:
|
| > oh martin! again with the helpful advice. by default, MOST browsers
display
| > an image with it's normal size...so your "advice" is STILL less than
useful.
| > one typically specifies size when one wants to control the size either
| > larger/smaller than the original. in this context, the op is most likely
| > going to want to have the images display uniformly...namely, a specific
| > height/width ratio with a max limit.
|
| Wrong wrong wrong!
|
| The width and height attributes of an IMG tag are NOT MEANT TO RESIZE
| IMAGES IN THE BROWSER!!!!!!!
i understand where the confusion is...his example specifically used the
size= attribute...when i talk about size, i mean height=/width=. i didn't
make that clear...i wasn't talking about his use of size= but was talking
about the context of the op's post...that the most useful advice would be on
how to resize into a thumb rather than showing the image in its orginial
size.
| I hope you are not using widht and height to resize your images! If so,
| your web developer hat and badge should be revoked.
hmmm...never heard of a "widht" attribute. ;^)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|