|
|
Posted by Veronica Karlsson on 05/16/06 19:47
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> Veronica Karlsson wrote:
>
> >> http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?q=&url=www.backwater-productions.net
> >>
> >> The quarter MILLION or so people who visit my server seem to think
> >> otherwise.
>
> >Have they emailed you and told you what they think or are you just
> >assuming that they must like it because of how many they are?
>
> ...if they didn't like em, why would my ranking continually increase?
> DUM DUM DUM DUM
Is this "ranking" based on something human, like interviews with users,
or some kind of technical measurement, like "hits" or something? IOW,
what does it *mean*? (clue: "many hits" != "readers like it")
> Boy, you sure do look STUPID when you try and justify your blatant
> idiocy.
>
> >> See you can say my sites suck as much as you want...
>
> >"sites"? I was just commenting on one page (the one you mentioned at the
> >beginning of this thread), and that one does suck.
>
> So what sucks about it?
Do you think it would be a good idea for me to tell you that? Surely
it's enough information to tell you that it does suck?
> You know, pushing aside your blatant penis
> envy and desperate need to lash out at something you personally are
> wholly incapable of EVER coming close to producing. Oh snap, there I
> go beatin up long side yer fat ugly head with that 'ol bitch reality,
> ne?
>
> >> but your
> >> NONpinions aren't worth shit without some relevant argument behind
> >> them.
>
> >What? You mean, like, communicating with you and tell you *why* it
> >sucks? Why should I do that?
>
> Well, for starters NOT looking like a bumbling fuckin retard...then
> again maybe you're okay with that. *shrugs*
That doesn't answer my question. Is there some reason why I should
motivate why my opinion is what it is?
> >> And the bottom line is that you stupid, jealous fools HAVE NO
> >> arguments, all you have is whiney little bitch snits about how much
> >> you covet my work.
>
> >Huh? (Doesn't that word mean... ?)
> >
> >*looks up "covet"*
> >
> >No, I do not covet your work.
>
> So you just REALLY like that circa 1996 porn site look, huh?
AFAIR, ca 1996 porn sites were very popular (though I don't see what
that has to do with your blog page).
> >> The majority of you pathetic fools couldn't even
> >> DREAM of creating a site as advanced as some of the ones I've put
> >> together.
>
> >1. advanced != good
>
> You sounda like...cave man
>
> You...no lika teh...advancement
>
> *grunt* *grunt*
>
> Fire...pretty...but burn stupid caveman
>
> *grunt*
>
> Fire...no good
The fact that your tool is newer does not automatically make the things
you build with it better.
> >2. I have seen no evidence of your page being "advanced".
>
> Cupcake, you're so the fuck far outta yer league you wouldn't know
> advanced if it suddenly crawled the fuck up yer ass and EXPLODED.
The page did not look one bit "advanced" to me.
> >> Fact of the matter is...yer just a bunch of fuckin poser
> >> ass wannabes. So if you don't like my sites, if you wanna sit there
> >> dribbling in yer pullups and start whining about how much you think
> >> they "suck"...log the fuck off, Stupid, go somewhere else, cause I
> >> sure as FUCK didn't make ANY of sites for trainable muppet fuck
> >> tweenage Ritalin addicts like you stupid kids.
>
> >You posted the link in a newsgroup. You got comments. Live with it!
>
> You got your comments ripped apart and then got all smacked up like a
> stupid bitch. Pull up yer wet lil Huggies, dry yer eyes and learn to
> fuckin deal already.
Your page still sucks.
--
__ __ _____ _____ ______ __ _ _ _____ __
||| \ \ ) )/ / \|| | \ \ / / \ \ | \ | || | / / \| ) \
||.. \ \/ /| |_/| | |_/ /| | | || \ | || || | / \
|.PP. \ / | | \| | | \ \| | | || |\_\| || || | / /\ \
_\/___ \_( \_\__/||_| \_\\_\__/_/ |_| |_||_| \_\__/|(_( \_\
|_______ Troll Spokeswoman _____ http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ___|
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|