|
|
Posted by dorayme on 10/06/40 11:17
> From: Travis Newbury <TravisNewbury@hotmail.com>
> Mark Parnell wrote:
>>Most sites *do* need to be accessible to everyone.
>
> Oh I completely agree with you. You can find a million times where I
> say that most sites, especially if they depend on their website for
> revenue, should be accessible to as many people as possible. But what I
> have a problem with is "need to be". I don't believe the web should be
> regulated so a site "has" to be accessible, or usable. Yes, if I am
> selling widgets it only make sense to have my site accessible, and
> usable by as many as possible.
That is not the impression you gave at the very beginning of this thread
when it was still called Trading Post. You were quite happy that the site
concerned was as slow as hell in operation on dial up. You were quite happy
that it seemed ok to you on broadband! Nothing else seemed to matter?
> I am completely against any form of regulation on the web. And forcing
> a site to be accessible or usable to all would be a regulation. Yes it
> might be dumb for a site to take that route, and in most cases it
> probably is dumb. But I would rather have sites learn from their
> stupidity or g out of business because of it than to regulate what they
> can or can not do.
Force? Any? Form? Regulation? Who is forcing what? I am wondering who you
are actually disputing? Who recognises you as criticising them in
particular? Name some names. C'mon Travis, lets have it all out, pick on
someone (not me) and lets see if they do say what you claim they are doing
and saying. In the end, it has to come down to individuals. You are making
these general claims, but get down to specifics. Name and accuse
individuals. You will never be as unpopular as me, ever, so don't worry...
:)
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|