|
|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 05/23/06 02:59
dorayme wrote:
> In article <4471bbc6$0$3706$cb0e7fc6@news.centralva.net>,
> "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
>
>> Travis Newbury wrote:
>>> This is assuming you have several years to wait for everyone to get a
>>> browser that CSS actually works correclty in....
>>>
>>> Otherwise, just use tables because it works....
>>>
>> Sorry that is BS, OP *is* using a table and *still* having difficulties!
>> Normally fixing the errors one can get very satisfactory results without
>> relying on tables for layout in spite of IE.
>
> I think Travis meant that there is a smaller learning curve to
> getting a table layout to look good and consistent over all
> browsers. Surely he is right, eh young Jonathan?
Not sure when he states "have several years to wait for everyone to get
a browser that CSS actually works correclty in" CSS works fro the most
part even in IE. What could be simpler then:
<h1>My Heading</h1>
<h2>Subheading</h2>
<p>Stuff about subheading....</p>
<h2>Another subheading</h2>
<p>More stuff about another subheading....</p>
Young? Er, <blush> well thank you <rocking foot on toe>
>
> If you set out a table for reasonable aims for websites, along
> with the methods of achieving them, along further with the levels
> of difficulty, and then, for good measure make a set of the
> various possible graphs, remarks like Travis's come from looking
> at different graphs to what you are looking at.
>
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|