|
|
Posted by Andy Dingley on 11/25/88 11:48
dorayme wrote:
> > More browsers support CSS usably than work with tables and fixed widths
> > in pixels
> >
> > (think mobile devices)
>
> If this is true, it is because the way you are counting and
> restricting the meaning of "usable" and leaving out puzzling
> visual behaviours .
By "usable" I'm assuming competent CSS coding giving a usable display
(subject to some rendering variation)
I accept that this isn't the case for typical sites in existence today,
but it's achievable with the right skills - and that's my point.
> If you count instances, the overwhelming
> number are on winboxes on IE on screens at least 14 inches
> diagonally.
Those are an easy target for usable CSS. They're even a practical
target for _accurate_ CSS rendering, for any halfway-competent
professional web developer. IE 4 is a rarity these days - you can't
seriously claim that it's a commercial problem to maintain
pixel-accuracy back that far.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|