Posted by DataPro on 10/02/80 11:48
Well SQL Server definetely seems to be a different animal.
Here are some questions a newguy like myself would have about the
logging.
The documentation says that once a backup log truncate only is done, a
full backup should be taken as the recovery ability of the system has
been degraded. Why is that, if that command merely archives committed
transactions?
A SELECT @@TRANCOUNT yields a count of zero.
dbcc opentran(eas) says zero also.
dbcc loginfo yeilds 308 rows marked with a '2' which apparently implies
that they are open transactions. Why don't they show up in trancount
then?
If a log backup supposedly makes the log 'reusable' then why would a 12
gig log grow another Gig right within a few hours of the backup with
minimal database use?
Wouldn't most of that space be reusable.
Please straighten me out on my thinking :)
Thanks
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|