|
|
Posted by Brendan Gillatt on 10/10/07 21:24
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:28:22 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:21:14 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ROFL
>>>>
>>>> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN">
>>>> <html>
>>>> <head>
>>>> <title>Backwater Productions</title>
>>>>
>>> ...I think you need to be retarded to find that funny.
>> I know you're retro-tarded to use those standards.
>> In case you need to bone up, here you go.
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html32
>
> Free cl00, Dipshit, that DTD tag is being used specifically as a means
> of triggering a layout effect on the page that otherwise wouldn't
> exist with any other DTD tag. I know this because I've actually
> tested EVERY single CSS and HTML tag on ALL major operating systems
> and browsers using each of the various DTDs to determine EXACTLY what
> effect each and every one of them has.
Who in hell actually believes that? Every single CSS tag? You don't even
use CSS! Please provide screen shots as to exactly what the effects are;
at least explain what the effects are.
Besides, it seems to work okay with a 4.01 DTD. I think someone is just
trying to stand out by being 'different'.
"each of the various DTDs" as if there is a standard set of DTDs =D
- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
iD4DBQFHDULwkA9dCbrNdDMRAoThAKDfA2eAjDoctfYfj41Q+33K9jkanACWO1lw
EWW6Uwc6jZC8tEq6euh8JA==
=x85H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Back to original message]
|