Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 01/06/08 18:58

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:24:22 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> claims he's ignoring me but writes:
>
>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:36:18 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:00:21 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:14:24 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-baiter@no.where>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:26:11 -0500, Gary L. Burnore
>>>>>>>>>> <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:47:33 GMT, Doug Baiter <doug-baiter@no.where>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>>>>>>>>>>>> <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <XrqdnW_lGbgurODanZ2dnUVZ_u_inZ2d@comcast.com> on Thu, 03 Jan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dick Gaughan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <C3A2D429.F13D%nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 18:04:25 +0000, Andy Jacobs <nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't get it. Why was the original post spam?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it wasn't spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fine. I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concern still has relevance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
>>>>>>>>>>>>> something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Right. Try again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is. The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup. And the FAQs for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> classify this as spam.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LIA[SLAP]
>>>>>>>>>>> FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable. Charters in unmoderated
>>>>>>>>>>> alt gorups are also uninforceable. Off charter in comp groups, on the
>>>>>>>>>>> other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
>>>>>>>>>> My bad - didn't look first at the group list. While perfectly
>>>>>>>>>> acceptable in AWW, in a comp group you're right in that its off
>>>>>>>>>> charter which *is* enforcable. Perhaps the zealots in AWW should
>>>>>>>>>> attempt to have it reclassified into a group that has an official
>>>>>>>>>> charter, but in the meantime nobody cares :o)
>>>>>>>>> There's really no such thing as a valid charter in an alt.* group.
>>>>>>>>> Alt.config is a bogus group of morons who want to turn alt into
>>>>>>>>> another form of big8 groups. Never gonna happen. Of course,
>>>>>>>>> moderated groups can and do control content but non-moderated groups
>>>>>>>>> are freeform. Stukkie will just have to learn to use a killfile
>>>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, please accept my apologies for the mistake.
>>>>>>>>> Accepted. Unfortunately, Jerry won't stop crossposting back to
>>>>>>>>> comp.*.
>>>>>>>> Sorry, Gary.
>>>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's see you prove that statement, Gary.
>>>>> You're doing it for me, Jerry. YOU are still posting to comp.lang.php
>>>>> and he's not "making you do it". YOU are the one posting off charter.
>>>>> YOU. Not him.
>>>>>
>>>> And your posts are on topic? ROFLMAO! Pot-Kettle-Black.
>>>>
>>> How's that ignoring me thing going, stukkie? OOPS, did you LIE again?
>>>
>> ROFLMAO! Keep it up, troll!
>>
>>>>>> you're just as bad as the troll is.
>>>>>>>> I have been attacked and maligned by two trolls in a.w.w
>>>>>>>> who have cross-posted to c.l.p. and other newsgroups. I will not let
>>>>>>>> those go away.
>>>>>>> Because you're owned. Owned owned owned.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, let's tell your employer you're a criminal and a fraud. See if you
>>>>>> like it?
>>>>> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
>>>>> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running? ROFLMAO!
>>> Hahahahaha. DataBasix isn't a WEBSITE, dumbass.
>>>
>> Nope, but you can't keep a website up. ROFLMAO!
>
> From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
> Message-ID: <dMWdnRMixOBvfx3anZ2dnUVZ_qKgnZ2d@comcast.com>
>
> WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
> can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.
>

So? Just because you can't find a website for it doesn't mean one
doesn't exist. But people can't find your site because you can't keep
it running.

>>>>>> But you're obviously a troll - familiar over a bunch of newsgroups and
>>>>>> message boards on the usenet. A quick search brings up several
>>>>>> complaints about your trolling.
>>>>> Poor little tard. You should surely soon be quoting that Jerry
>>>>> Terranson website and stepping right into kookdom. Once you find it,
>>>>> you'll see why I feel safe in saying that people who make up false
>>>>> shit about you don't matter. YOU're the one who's making a fool of
>>>>> yourself.
>>>>>
>>>> A lot more than just one website, troll.
>>> Bring it on, stuckkie. You know you want to.
>>>
>> Not at all. I don't have to. Too many others have exposed you for the
>> troll you are.
>
> Coward.
>

Nope, others have done a fantastic job on you already, troll. I don't
need to do anything more.

>>>>>> So from now on I'll just ignore you - like the ignorant should be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However, it may not be a problem from at least one of these for much longer.
>>>>>>> If he loses an account because you lied to his NSP, I'll see to it he
>>>>>>> gets a free account. Since you've decided to go play NetKKKop, I'll
>>>>>>> take every one of your off charter posts to your provider, comcast. K?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No lies. Just showing the ISP's what they've done.
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry, troll. No lies.
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>
>> Projecting again, Troll?
>
> Jerry claims suing is illegal
>
> From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
> Message-ID: <dMWdnRMixOBvfx3anZ2dnUVZ_qKgnZ2d@comcast.com>
>
> You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
> are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.
>
>
>
> Jerry on websites:
>
> From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
> Message-ID: <ZfSdnXhomogIeh3anZ2dnUVZ_vCknZ2d@comcast.com>
>
> Gary L. Burnore wrote:
> > On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> > <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >> Ok, let's tell your employer you're a criminal and a fraud.
> >> See if you like it?
> >
> > Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
> > DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
> >
>
> Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
> ROFLMAO!
>
> While also saying
>
> From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
> Message-ID: <dMWdnRMixOBvfx3anZ2dnUVZ_qKgnZ2d@comcast.com>
>
> WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
> can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.

Yawn. Try something new, troll.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]