Posted by d on 09/28/94 11:41

"Michael Fesser" <netizen@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:fure02t435vuo04krp9hv602o2nj4rme48@4ax.com...
> .oO(good.midget@gmail.com)
>
>>Don't mean to be a total dick... but browser's without JS????
>
> There are more than enough user agents without JS capabilities. And
> there are a dozen reasons to disable or at least restrict JS in browsers
> that are capable of executing it. Relying on JS is broken by design.

But you don't know what the audience is. It might be an intranet site,
where security and JS is mandated by the office policy. In such a case she
doesn't even have to test cross-browser.

Telling someone they shouldn't do something isn't automatically helpful,
especially when you don't know the big picture.

> Micha

[Back to original message]