|
|
Posted by Auggie on 09/26/76 11:49
"William Hughes" <cvproj@grandecom.net> wrote in message
news:9v68829t6sbcg4j39cugecrn50970c1fov@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 14:48:56 +1000, in alt.html Mark Parnell
> <webmaster@clarkecomputers.com.au> wrote:
> >Deciding to do something for the good of humanity, William Hughes
> ><cvproj@grandecom.net> declared in alt.html:
> >
> >> Hmm... looks like IFRAME is the only semi-reliable option at this
> >> point.
> >
> >Preprocessing is always reliable and always available.
>
> True, but there are disk-space limitations to consider...
Unless you are running the site off a 1.44 floppy there isn't.
By preprocessing what he means is all your SSI and server side scripting
would be compiled and HTML pages would be generated. This doesn't mean that
image and media files used by the site are duplicated over and over again.
HTML is raw ascii text, meaning that 1024 characters is 1KB... If all your
HTML pages were exactly 80 characters wide you would need 13,000 lines of
HTML to fill up 1MB
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|