|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 08/11/06 03:24
Shelly wrote:
>>Tony Marston wrote:
>>
>>>"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
>>>news:zoGdnTyimMPRUETZnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Tony Marston wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Mark A. Boyd" <mblist@sanDotrr.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>news:Xns9819C73F142DCmblistssanDotrrcom@66.75.164.119...
>>>>>
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>>Do you support the idea that the ability to create different functions
>>>>>with the *same spelling* but *different case* is a good thing? Can you
>>>>>point to any online resources which support this idea?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Tony,
>>>>
>>>>No one in this thread has suggested doing this.
>>>
>>>
>>>Wrong! Both you and Shelley have repeatedly stated that you would make
>>>use of the ability to create different functions with the same spelling
>>>but different case. If you are now saying that you would never make use
>>>of that ability then why are we arguiing? You are now aying that you
>>>would never do that, and all I am saying is that NO ONLY would I never do
>>>that BUT ALSO the ability to do such a stupid thing should be removed
>>>from the language.
>>>
>>>All you are doing is arguing about removiing a feature from the language
>>>which you say you don't use.
>>>
>>
>>Nope, neither Shelley nor I ever stated we would do that. I'd like to see
>>you point to a message otherwise. But you can't - because you can't even
>>tell your own posts from someone else's, stoopid Tony.
>
>
> 1 - Actually, both of us said we would do that (rarely) if they were for
> different scopes (local vs global) and if that were the convention.
> Personally, I have never done this yet.
>
> 2 - His bringing this up is a straw man. Don't address his diversion. We
> said it is not normal practice and we follow good conventions. It is
> allowed, and if the convention called for different case for different
> scopes that is what we would do. This became that we advocate doing it.
>
> 3 - Why are you wasting you time with this guy? He distorts statements,
> selectively edits and emphasis only what is beneficial to his arguments.
> Case in point he says now that I insulted him first. Of course that is a
> baldfaced lie. But as Hitler orten said, tell a lie often enough and people
> will start to believe you. The reason I withdrew from answering him is
> because he insulted me twice while all I did was talk to the issues. (I
> insulted him after that). I advise you to do the same and let him bask
> alone in his own ill-mannered, obsolete ignorance.
>
> BTW, it is "Shelly" (short for Sheldon).
>
> Shelly
>
>
You're right, Shelley (sorry about the spelling). He is a complete loser.
And he's a troll, also. Notice how someone started this thread - and
Tony hopped right in? Then we never hear from the originator again.
I'm sure either that loser Tony started it under an assumed name - or
asked someone else to start it.
He's just a troll - and a stupid one at that, isn't he?
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|