|
|
Posted by tuntis on 02/11/07 18:18
Leif K-Brooks wrote:
> tuntis wrote:
>> I don't use WYSIWYG tools; it is much more confusing/just plain
>> confusing to have "z-indexes", "absolute positioning" and whatever the
>> else you can invent.
>
> z-index is only necessary for stacking one element on top of another,
> which is something that you _can't_do_ with a table-based layout.
Oh, sorry, I don't really know the proper terms for all that "stuff".
John Hosking wrote:
> Properly made CSS layouts don�t suck and are easy to manage - often
even easier than table layouts.
Often? I thought that was "always".
> I admit it. I am ashamed of myself for my idolatry. Pardon me while I
disassemble my shrine (which I have relatively positioned in the corner,
1% of the room's width away from the left wall...)
You're funny. (No, that wasn't sarcasm.)
> It's not only incorrect, it's *very* incorrect? Must be pretty bad.
Correct.
> Wrong? Oh. :-(
Oh wow! How about you shove your "sarcasm" up your ass? Internet *is*
serious business, you know!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|