|
|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 02/11/07 18:40
tuntis wrote:
> Leif K-Brooks wrote:
>> tuntis wrote:
>>> I don't use WYSIWYG tools; it is much more confusing/just plain
>>> confusing to have "z-indexes", "absolute positioning" and whatever
>>> the else you can invent.
>>
>> z-index is only necessary for stacking one element on top of another,
>> which is something that you _can't_do_ with a table-based layout.
> Oh, sorry, I don't really know the proper terms for all that "stuff".
> John Hosking wrote:
> > Properly made CSS layouts don�t suck and are easy to manage - often
> even easier than table layouts.
> Often? I thought that was "always".
> > I admit it. I am ashamed of myself for my idolatry. Pardon me while I
> disassemble my shrine (which I have relatively positioned in the corner,
> 1% of the room's width away from the left wall...)
> You're funny. (No, that wasn't sarcasm.)
> > It's not only incorrect, it's *very* incorrect? Must be pretty bad.
> Correct.
> > Wrong? Oh. :-(
> Oh wow! How about you shove your "sarcasm" up your ass? Internet *is*
> serious business, you know!
>
And you might pull your head out of yours...his points are good if your
actually considered them. Anyway if you are replying to John why did you
post under Leif?
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|