|
Posted by TaliesinSoft on 02/16/07 21:05
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:13:02 -0600, Calum wrote (in article
<er538b$m6v$2@reader01.news.esat.net>):
> TaliesinSoft wrote:
>
>> As to why Adobe chose to not use Dreamweaver, that would be interesting
>> to know.
>
> Probably because their website has been around for a lot longer than
> they've owned Macromedia, and there wouldn't be much point in changing
> over just for the hell of it.
So then, why didn't Adobe use their own GoLive which has been part of the
Adobe arsenal for quite a few years now, Adobe purchasing it in 1999.
--
James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|