|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 02/25/07 03:03
e_matthes@hotmail.com wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have set up some custom exceptions, and have managed to implement
> the proper responses to those exceptions. I have something like this:
>
> try {
> do something;
> } catch (ExceptionA $e) {
> response;
> } catch (ExceptionB $e) {
> response;
> } catch (ExceptionC $e) {
> response;
> } catch (ExceptionD $e) {
> response;
> } catch (Exception $e) {
> respond to unknown exception;
> }
>
> It's a little clunky though, because sometimes responses to Exceptions
> B, C, and D are the same. Is there any way to collect those specific
> exceptions together in a specific response situation? In other words,
> what I'd love to do is:
>
> try {
> do something;
> } catch (ExceptionA $e) {
> response;
> } catch (ExceptionB $e OR ExceptionC $e OR ExceptionD $e) {
> response;
> } catch (Exception $e) {
> respond to unknown exception;
> }
>
> I know I could catch Exception A, then catch the parent Exception
> class, then $e->getcode, and respond to the code in an if-else clause
> or switch clause. But is there any way to do this with the exceptions
> themselves, i.e. catch a group of exceptions together? Thanks.
>
No, but you can derive B, C and D from the same class (BCD) and handle
an exception for BCD.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|