|
|
Posted by Kevin Scholl on 04/02/07 00:53
dorayme wrote:
> PS has traditionally been better for photo manipulations. Yes, FW
> has a lot of tools but it is not as easy for many things as PS
> (the actual steps for many manipulations are awkward). FW is good
> for moving bits around (esp. on the same layer!), sizing
> elements, generally organising an image, especially a complex one
> and above all fabulous in exporting smallish files (PS is
> hopeless on this, even the awkward "web sister" program
> ImageReady is not so impressive)
Could you elaborate, please. Where exactly do these other applications
hold any significant advantage over PS/IM when exporting "smallish" files?
--
*** Remove the DELETE from my address to reply ***
======================================================
Kevin Scholl http://www.ksscholl.com/
kscholl@comcast.DELETE.net
------------------------------------------------------
Information Architecture, Web Design and Development
------------------------------------------------------
We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of
the dreams...
======================================================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|