|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 04/21/07 21:59
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 08:12:54 GMT David Dorward scribed:
> Neredbojias wrote:
>
>>> No, one should provide meaningful alternative text for images. Most
>>> times it should probably *not* be a description.
>>
>> What would you provide for an advertisement? "Ad pic"? If so, that
>> is a description, too.
>
> alt="Some product, $9.99 from MyMart"
Sure, that is a great alt text. I can even somewhat agree with the
argument that it "should be" included. But ought _all_ images be
_required_ to have alt text? Uh uh.
--
Neredbojias
He who laughs last sounds like an idiot.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|