|
|
Posted by Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 05/05/07 02:15
Joel Shepherd wrote:
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote:
>> Perhaps Google is confused by the two missing images (NClass2.jpg and
>> foreaft.jpg), or perhaps Google can't read in your font choices of
>> "Lucida Handwriting", "Castellar", or "Book Antiqua" ...
>
> I must have missed something. Since when did Google (or any other
> search engine for that matter) care about fonts specified in the
> document? Are you saying the pigeons were confused?
I'm sorry, I'll have to remove my tongue from the cheek in order to
answer you. (Was just getting in a wee shot at the poor choice of
fontfaces, and missing images.) ;-)
> Since "vic" moved his pages -- changed their URL -- a more likely
> explanation for the problem is that all the sites that linked to his
> pages in their old location still do, and _don't_ link to the pages
> in the new location. Fewer links in usually means lower standings in
> search results, at least on Google. "vic" could track those pages
> down (using Google's "link:" syntax, contact the site owners and ask
> them to update their links.
>
> That's likely to be more effective than dorking about with font
> names, doncha think?
Oh, absolutely. Though it may not take long.
"Your search - link:home.comcast.net/~idreos/ - did not match any
documents."
--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|