|
|
Posted by dorayme on 05/13/07 20:55
In article
<LuI1i.9485$Ut6.1690@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"BootNic" <bootnic@bounce.earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Jonathan N. Little <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
> > news: e5fa8$464734b2$40cba7b1$29879@NAXS.COM
> [snip]
> > http://www.littleworksstudio.com/temp/usenet/k2262.pdf
> > k2262.pdf (application/pdf Object 332KB)
> >
> > I redid in HTML (plus a little improved styling IMO)
> >
> > http://www.canadianscottishterrierclub.org/2007national.html
> >
> > and it is only 52KB. Less than 1/6 the size, which on dialup is
> > significant.
>
>
> The file size does not need be that great of differance.
>
> 64.2 KB (65,766 bytes)
> [url]
> http://home.earthlink.net/~bootnic/example.pdf
> [/url]
Two things, Bootnic is right and pdfs can be prepared for the web
much smaller than they usually are. The skills needed for this (I
think export menu commands!) are less than the skills needed for
rendering the show in html. The other thing, it is not always
cost effective for a person or company to write or have things
written in HTML. Pity, true.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|