|
|
Posted by Julien Biezemans on 06/26/07 07:34
shimmyshack wrote:
>
> you can also use a wrapper around stream_wrapper_register()!! hee hee
>
> in the end, the usefulness of this kind of statement is surely pretty
> small - well my imagination is limited I suppose, can it really be
> called a "stream protocol"?
> fopen('mailto:u...@domain.com', 'w');
> stream_wrapper_register_even_the_fake_ones( $p, $m='r' )
> {
> //if first 7 chars are 'mailto',
> //{ replace
> //mailto: with mailto:// and do it
> //stream_wrapper_register(str_replace('mailto:','mailto://',$p, $r);
> //}
> }
>
> etc blah.
>
> stream_wrapper_register_even_the_fake_ones( 'mailto:blah@blah.com',
> 'w' );
>
> if you come up with a class that codes for the entire mailto thing
> with imap support and so on please send it along, it would be useful I
> guess
>
Thank you for your reply but I'm not quite sure I understand your idea
and my guess is that you mixed up stream_wrapper_register() and fopen()
functionality.
When I read
stream_wrapper_register_even_the_fake_ones( 'mailto:blah@blah.com',
'w' );
I think you meant
fopen('mailto:blah@blah.com', 'w');
Right?
I don't see how a wrapper around stream_wrapper_register() will help
because what is important is the scheme being actually registered and
the str_replace() trick still register "mailto://" and not "mailto:",
from PHP internals point of view.
Cheers,
Julien.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|