Posted by Rami Elomaa on 07/21/07 20:16

Sanders Kaufman kirjoitti:
> Michael Fesser wrote:
>> .oO(Rami Elomaa)
>
>>> PEAR is certainly the one you should look into at first. It's basicly
>>> the De Facto framework for php.
>>
>> I wouldn't consider it a framework, but a library.
>
> Even the PEAR folks themselves don't even try to claim it's a framework.
>

What the fuck now? pear.php.net: "PEAR is a framework and distribution
system for reusable PHP components."

I think that's pretty fucking straightforward claiming that it in fact
is framework, but what the fuck do I care. That ain't none of my
business. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, maybe I'll shut up.

--
Rami.Elomaa@gmail.com

"Wikipedia on vähän niinq internetin raamattu, kukaan ei pohjimmiltaan
usko siihen ja kukaan ei tiedä mikä pitää paikkansa." -- z00ze

• Next in forum: Re: Framework, which one?
• Prev in forum: Re: Using a Resource as a Class Property
• Thread view: Re: Framework, which one?

[Reply to this message]