> I agree with cyw-whatever, though, that it's not a good deal, -at least in
> the US. Furthermore, 512 kbps isn't particularly "hi-speed" for hi-speed
> connections, anyway. I'd hold out for something better.
>
"hi-speed" is relative. When I first started engineering data circuits
anything above 1200 baud was considered "hi-speed." I know some folks
in the podunks that would love to get 512 kbps.