|
|
Posted by Bear Bottoms on 08/10/07 23:48
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:24:20 -0500, Yrrah <Yrrah.spamnothere@hitmail.com>
wrote:
> Craig <netburgher@REMOVEgmail.com>:
>
>> Would either of you be willing to outline the criticisms that Ben's
>> referring to? The best I can gather so far, one criticism is that CSE
>> refers to its syntax checker(?) as a validator, a name usually ascribed
>> to the W3C site functions.
>
> The free version has no validator, only a very rudimentary and
> completely useless syntax checker of some sorts. The giveaway of
> yesterday 'standard version' has, but it does not do batch validation
> and you may just as well use the on line W3C Validation Service:
> http://validator.w3.org/ or
> http://www.w3schools.com/site/site_validate.asp
> There are more on and off line validators, link checkers etc. (not all
> free), e.g. see:
> http://htmlhelp.com/links/validators.htm
> I have not looked at those though.
>
> Yrrah
I think not. The online W3C validator does a fair job, but CSE does a much
better job, with clearer instructions, and many more tools. There actually
is no comparison...CSE blows W3C out. I've used all 3, W3C...the free CSE
which I agree is not very good, and the GOTD free giveaway which is
awesome.
--
Bear Bottoms
Freeware website http://bearbottoms1.com
ACF freeware: http://freeware.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|