|
Posted by Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 08/11/07 17:54
In alt.html, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> Bear Bottoms wrote:
>> CSE is the answer. I can give you proof of the pudding. Go validate
>> my website with W3C http://bearbottoms1.com. It gets a clean bill of
>> health whereas when I just recently downloaded the free offer for
>> the payware version of CSE, and it found one error and about 10
>> issues. I've been going through those and they are valid issues.
>
> Valid means that it follows the proper rules and syntax it does not
> necessarily mean *good* design. Aside of your page being clumsy
> vintage 1990's coding what are the *issues* CSE InValidator found?
<big> <big><big> <br><br></big></big></big> ?
I would write that as:
<huge> <br²></huge>
Moving along...:
<small><small><font color="#112168" size="3">
<small><small><strong><br></strong></small></small></font></small></small>
'Twas funny sending it to the w3c validator and overriding as Strict:
"Failed validation, 1527 Errors"
Bear, your page needs more help than either W3C or Albert can give you.
:-)
--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|