|
|
Posted by dalyea@gmail.com on 08/25/07 04:35
On Aug 23, 5:16 am, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<a.nony.m...@example.invalid> wrote:
> John Hosking wrote:
> > dal...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> Thanks for the reply. I fixed all 158 errors and now the page passes
> >> on W3C. That was the right place to start, you're right.
>
> I did suggest using HTML 4.01 Strict ("Failed validation, 165 Errors")
> but it would be easier, far easier, to rewrite the page(s) from scratch
> to move from Transitional to Strict.
>
> > Beauregard also pointed you tohttp://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
> > where you will see that you still have 36 errors in yourCSS. You're
> > not done starting. ;-)
>
> Not to mention styling errors embedded in the HTML, such as:
>
> style="margin: 4 0 4 0;
>
> 4 what? Hobnobs? Potatoes?
>
> >> So now - what? The top of the page is still off.
>
> > If I add 300px to each of your left: values in #logo1t and #logo1w,
> > the header looks better, though not perfect, and possibly not what
> > you wanted, and as BTS mentioned, it breaks badly when I upsize the
> > text.
>
> Did you notice how the banner graphic scrolls in IE6, but not anywhere
> else? This page is another case of "designed in IE - works ok, now what
> to I have to hack to get it to work in better browsers?"
>
> And somehow I don't associate pink and powder blue with skiing... (no,
> I am not a skier.)
>
> --
> -bts
> -Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck
Thanks for the feedback. Just made more fixes. And I'll continue to
do
more until it's all clean and neat. Pink and blue = skiing, for sure!
David
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|