| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Steve on 09/18/07 15:01 
"Shelly" <sheldonlg.news@asap-consult.com> wrote in message  
news:13evoir44bali44@corp.supernews.com... 
> 
> "Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote in message  
> news:0bRHi.6$W76.1@newsfe12.lga... 
>> 
>> "Shelly" <sheldonlg.news@asap-consult.com> wrote in message  
>> news:13evm5v1at70h21@corp.supernews.com... 
>>> Steve, I know that atheists like to claim that it is "lack of belief",  
>>> but go to websters at www.m-w.com.  It specifically states that it is  
>>> "disbelief in the existence of deity".  What you call "atheism" is  
>>> really "agnosticism".  Again, from Websters: 
>> 
>> negative, ghost rider. 
>> 
>> i am without belief in god. remember your latin. i am without belief in  
>> god. whatever you want to call that, that's what i am. i see no evidence  
>> for god, and in such a state, i cannot be agnostic. i do not allow for  
>> the possibility of god's existence due to lack of evidence. agnostics  
>> believe that god could possibly exist, we just cannot know for sure. that  
>> is NOT me. 
>> 
>> i don't know where i'm losing you here, shelly. perhaps we have different  
>> versions of websters. perhaps as she aged, meriam couldn't help herself  
>> either and started using disbelief - which means there is evidence there  
>> is something in which to believe...a gross presumption. try other  
>> dictionaries. they all differ. hell, dictionary.com definition shows many  
>> sources. here's what i love seeing...it shows complete lack of  
>> understanding which is why we are having this discourse. 
>> 
>> american heritage: 
>> 
>> disbelief or denial of the existence of god or gods. 
>> 
>> right next to: 
>> 
>> a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods. 
>> 
>> doesn't denial mean there is unequivically something in evidence for me  
>> to deny? are you getting my point? 
> 
> No, and yes.  Example: 
> 
> Statgement: "I watched TV last night" 
> Denial:  No you didn't. 
> 
> Where is there something in unequivocably in evidence for having watched  
> TV last night?   It is still a "denial". 
 
good point. however, it is what is done after 'denial' that makes an atheist  
or agnostic. 
 
> OK, you can live with your definition from American Heritage.  All my  
> life, we always referred to Websters, so I'll live with mine. 
 
i perfer not being labeled at all. ;^)
 
  
Navigation:
[Reply to this message] 
 |