|
|
Posted by G on 10/10/07 21:53
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:20:39 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 13:00:49 -0700, "G" <.@.> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>> "G" <.@.> wrote in message
>>>>> news:470bd5cd$0$14146$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
>>>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 14:12:43 -0500, "Steve" <no.one@example.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Brendan Gillatt"
>>>>>>>> <brendanREMOVETHIS@brendanREMOVETHISgillatt.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>>>>> message news:cJ6dnZPFErQQAJbanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net...
>>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Haven't replied to this post yet? Still googling for the
>>>>>>>>> definition of assembly language? Decided that Steve and I do
>>>>>>>>> in fact know a damn lot more than you when it comes to
>>>>>>>>> web-design?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> he'll never say that. he usually just leaves a post dead when
>>>>>>>> really embarrassed, or the more it becomes obvious that he's a
>>>>>>>> tard, he'll throw bigger and bigger tantrums, snip your points
>>>>>>>> thinking that out-of-site is out-of-mind, or he makes it
>>>>>>>> obvious that he's ignoring your point by cutting it off with
>>>>>>>> '<cock slap>'...which i've started to do in turn with most of
>>>>>>>> his rantings. the guy's a duche with no personal life. he's
>>>>>>>> piss about that so he
>>>>>>>> vents here. sad really.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey Steve, at the end of the day...I have websites...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A fan site about the Care Bears?
>>>>>
>>>>> exactly. and no client list either. ;^)
>>>>
>>>> Does the myspace thing count? Maybe he's including the out-a-box
>>>> blog crap too.
>>>> Not sure, but those Flash sites he's got going on, whew, that's
>>>> like, big time programming huh?
>>>>
>>>> Sheet. All those could be redone in Swish in about a day.
>>>>
>>>> LOL
>>>
>>> Then let's see 'em, Junior! Or is talking shit all the better you
>>> can do? And really, it's not as if you can bitch about the time it
>>> would take seeing as how you spend ALL FUCKIN DAY LONG replying to
>>> my posts with all your posturing, bloated bullshit.
>>
>> I'll look for an out-a-the-box editor that's still coding to 3.2
>> standards and see if I can match your stuff.
>> No, wait. I can't.
>> You're right. I can't.
>
> Of course you can't, because I straight code in Notepad and know
> specifically why exactly you would want to use that particular DTD
> with that particular page layout form in order to achieve the maximum
> level of cross browser/OS compatibility.
>
> You, in all your stupidity, can't actually code, well, anything. You
> rely wholly on WYSIWYG editors written by tweenage muppet fucks with
> halfass support and template wizard bullshit.
First off, there's some serious doubt about you doing anything "straight".
But hey, if it's boi's you're into, far be it for me to stand in any kind of
judgment.
Now, moving on.
Your notepad and 3.2 layout is the only way to achieve max compatibility,
huh?
What a stupidfuck. No wonder all you got going on is some kiddie shit.
BTW. I wonder how it is that the Care Bear crowd hasn't caught on you're
making ad money using their content.
Hmmm
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|