|
|
Posted by asdf on 12/19/07 22:07
"Steve" <no.one@example.com> wrote in message
news:Hxdaj.193$dh1.173@newsfe05.lga...
>
> "Erwin Moller"
> <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spamyourself.com> wrote in
> message news:4769595c$0$85795$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
>> ???? ??? ?????? wrote:
>>> Excuse me!!
>>> Would you stop for a moment?!
>>> O...man...Haven't you thought-one day- about yourself ?
>>> Who has made it?
>>> Have you seen a design which hasn't a designer ?!
>>
>> Good question, ???? ??? ??????!
>> Who made your designer?
>> .....
>> Well??
>
> well, obviously since nothing complex that we've every experienced has
> begun as something more simple, the most reasonable answer would
> be...something more complex than the designer. begging the same question
> ad-nauseum of each increasingly more complex creator.
>
> lest we forget, gawd is a 'special' case and being omni* does not require
> something more complex to create him/her/it/them.
>
> erwin, on the notion of irreducibly complex...has the proponent of that
> argument *ever* been able to show something that was? and that's forgiving
> the man-made, relative notions of complexity, order, randomness, etc..
I prefer the belief that as higher powers are reached, entropy takes over,
where things become more and more random and less structured, rather than
moreso.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|