Posted by Jasper Bryant-Greene on 07/29/05 14:35

Hi all

Recently I've been reading /Code Complete/ by Steve McConnell, and in it
he recommends the use of ADTs, or Abstract Data Types, which I have been
thinking about implementing in a major project I am currently embarking on.

Basically the question that I have for the list is this:

If I have a relatively simple class, for example Photo, then why does
McConnell recommend that I do this:

<?php
$caption = $instanceOfPhotoClass->getCaption();
//do something with $caption
$instanceOfPhotoClass->setCaption($caption);
?>

Rather than this:

<?php
$caption = $instanceOfPhotoClass->caption;
// do something with $caption
$instanceOfPhotoClass->caption = $caption;
?>

I'm just looking for some alternative explanations to what McConnell
offers in the book. I can understand that the first example allows me to
"know" when an attribute has been modified... but it annoys me that I
have code like this:

class Photo {
private $caption;

[...]

public function setCaption($newCaption) {
$this->caption = $newCaption;
}
}

It just seems so pointless......

Thanks in advance for any comments.

Jasper

• Next in forum: Re: [PHP] PHP noobie
• Prev in forum: Re: [PHP] overwrite private class members in php5?
• Thread view: Fundamental question about ADTs

[Reply to this message]