|
|
Posted by Jarkko Kuoppamδki on 01/12/08 21:50
dorayme wrote:
> In article <J%7ij.280098$mT6.42011@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi>,
> Safari 2.0.4 gets you what you want with the above (as long as
> cell2 and cell3 have the same "amount" of content). But you might
> say more about what you are really doing before anyone here will
> try hard to get you as close to what you might be happy with
> cross-browser-wise.
I'll see if I can get a copy of the original page available. Meanwhile:
cell1 is dynamic content, and depending on the end user's choices,
displaying it may take space a little (no problem) or more.
There used to be two additional cells on top of cell1, which worked
fine: if cell1 grew, cell4 (on the bottom) next to it grew. However, the
two additional cells were taking space and I was asked to remove them. I
did and now I'm asked why cell2 and cell3 are stretched vertically.
It is starting to look like I need to redesign the left side of the
table, even though they were given as a layout that is used everywhere
else on the site in question.
--Jarkko
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|