|
|
Posted by dorayme on 01/12/08 22:29
In article <3Daij.280200$iD7.84220@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi>,
Jarkko Kuoppamδki
<jarkko.kuoppamaki@gmail.nospamplease.com.invalid> wrote:
> dorayme wrote:
> > In article <J%7ij.280098$mT6.42011@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi>,
> > Safari 2.0.4 gets you what you want with the above (as long as
> > cell2 and cell3 have the same "amount" of content). But you might
> > say more about what you are really doing before anyone here will
> > try hard to get you as close to what you might be happy with
> > cross-browser-wise.
>
> I'll see if I can get a copy of the original page available. Meanwhile:
> cell1 is dynamic content, and depending on the end user's choices,
> displaying it may take space a little (no problem) or more.
>
> There used to be two additional cells on top of cell1, which worked
> fine: if cell1 grew, cell4 (on the bottom) next to it grew. However, the
> two additional cells were taking space and I was asked to remove them. I
> did and now I'm asked why cell2 and cell3 are stretched vertically.
>
> It is starting to look like I need to redesign the left side of the
> table, even though they were given as a layout that is used everywhere
> else on the site in question.
>
> --Jarkko
Are you noting what I said about browsers? It might be pertinent
at least to mention what browsers you are testing in. It is an
interesting matter how different browsers calculate things
differently.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|