|
|
Posted by on 10/06/30 11:24
actually, i didn't check...grammar-boy was a different thread. i was teasing
the last respondant about his love of fire-fox over "the other" browser.
;^)
cheers.
"" <a@b.com> wrote in message news:HVuNe.1160$WO2.336@fe06.lga...
| theoretically you can do it if you can work with the window's api...your
| performance is going to suck though. php has no means of making the script
| thread sleep...your script will have to be a continual loop - that's why
| that's a big concern.
|
| you are simply choosing the wrong tool for the job. and, i didn't know you
| could compile php into an exe. you certainly *can not* make a php script
| work as a window's service either.
|
| you need to use a non-script language...although tcl/tk is a script
language
| that *may* be able to do it - with a lot of hacking.
|
| hth,
|
| me
|
| btw...i was just commenting on the shitty grammer of the last respondant
| anyway. ;^)
|
|
| "Max" <max@max.com> wrote in message
| news:B7uNe.32545$a81.20649@fe03.news.easynews.com...
|| You guys have completely misunderstood what I'm trying to do.
||
|| This has nothing to do with web serving.
||
|| I want to run a PHP script in a loop that monitors some computers. I will
| be
|| running this PHP script FROM the computer, from the command line.
Probably
| I
|| will compile it into an .exe.
||
|| I'm also trying to figure out if I can run the application as a systray
| app
|| so that a tooltip window pops up when monitored computer goes down.
||
|| Someone suggested PHP-GTK, which I've worked with, and that might be the
|| key.
||
|| Any other suggestions?
||
||
|| "" <a@b.com> wrote in message news:7VqNe.1870$1g2.229@fe05.lga...
|| >| There are fewer than the fingers on one hand, sites that I visit with
a
|| > | browser other than FF.
|| >
|| > or can sucessfully. lol. ;^)
|| >
|| > |The other browser is totally insecure just for
|| > | these few sites because I need to use them.
|| >
|| > yeah, most of the porn links *are* where you get your common, garden
|| > variety
|| > trojan horses and exploit hacks. ;^) and, since ff doesn't correctly
|| > handle/support most of the w3c specifications, it is not suprising in
| the
|| > least that it is harder to compromise a system through it when browsing
|| > said
|| > sites.
|| >
|| > it has a cool gooie though...almost looks just like "the other
browser".
|| >
|| > p.s. i'm just giving you a hard time. ;^)
|| >
|| >
||
||
|
|
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|