|
Posted by Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 11/01/05 22:26
cyber0ne wrote:
>> background-color: transparent;
>
> w3.org's validator still gives me a warning when I use that. I just
> put up a new one with specified colors for the rest of the warnings.
> All that's left is that warning for the transparent ones and the
> errors for the IE-hacked elements.
This is still for: http://www.cyber0ne.com/test/css/ ?
I just now re-ran the CSS validator and see no warnings for transparent.
However, those other errors are still present (the * lines) and others
saying Parse error - Unrecognized : }
Warnings
URI : http://www.cyber0ne.com/test/css/screen.css
* Line : 11 (Level : 1) You have no background-color with your color
: a:active
* Line : 11 (Level : 1) You have no background-color with your color
: a:active
* Line : 11 (Level : 1) You have no background-color with your color
: a:active
* Line : 11 (Level : 1) You have no background-color with your color
: a:active
* Line : 17 (Level : 1) You have no background-color with your color
: a:hover
* Line : 23 (Level : 1) This property applies to block-level
elements. : p
* Line : 187 (Level : 1) This property applies to block-level
elements. : #randomimage
* Line : 211 (Level : 1) This property applies to block-level
elements. : #radio
* Line : 281 (Level : 1) This property applies to block-level
elements. : #google
* Line : 344 (Level : 1) This property applies to block-level
elements. : .BoxText
"All bets are off!" <g>
>> ... Could that float have anything to do with your problems?
>
> I just removed the reference to that stylesheet and there's no
> change. That's just part of the radio thing in the iframe, and I
> don't think it was even being used.
Well, since it was being called, and after the main css, it would
supercede and add that float, so I thought it best to rule it out.
--
-bts
-Warning: I brake for lawn deer
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|