|
|
Posted by Barbara de Zoete on 11/03/60 11:41
On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 03:36:47 +0100, David Dorward <dorward@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Barbara de Zoete wrote:
>
>>> CSS support is quite often lacking on hand held devices.
>>
>> Ah, see. I don't aim for handhelds.
>
> Nor do I. It is an advantage of writing structured markup - you don't
> need
> to aim for any particular device, it "just works" wherever the reader
> cares
> to read it (or listen to it, etc).
>> I don't think my site is read with a handheld ever, or close to never at
>> least.
>
> Is this the age old "Nobody reads my site with Firefox, therefore I won't
> support Firefox, therefore nobody *can* read my site with Firefox, GOTO
> 10"
> issue?
Reading back, starts to sound like that, doesn't it? Sorry for that. I
seem to have fallen for the 'old attitude' some people still have about IE
and other browsers nowadays, just for an other technique :-)
Anyway, thanks for the insight in my own thinking.
[ prefetching images to be used with css rollover styles ]
> So why not use CSS to precache the images rather than HTML? Setting them
> as
> backgrounds on elements inside a 1x1 overflow hidden div would probably
> do
> the job (hacking around the issue of browsers not fetching images
> referenced by styles with selectors that don't match any elements in the
> document). It's a touch ugly in the markup, but doesn't come with the
> "Here's a content image" side effects.
That's good thinking. I like this solution. I'll remember it for future
use.
Thanks, David for being decent and patient with me. For letting me learn
something.
--
______PretLetters:
| weblog | http://www.pretletters.net/weblog/weblog.html |
| webontwerp | http://www.pretletters.net/html/webontwerp.html |
|zweefvliegen | http://www.pretletters.net/html/vliegen.html |
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|