|
|
Posted by Michael Winter on 03/19/06 00:22
On 18/03/2006 21:44, Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
[snip]
> ...would you feel better about it if I had said, "Remember When That
> Retard Michael Was Saying That The Eval Function Was Pointless Because
> He Thinks There's Better Ways Of Accomplishing The Same Thing?"
No, not particularly as I never wrote that, either. In any case, it's
irrelevant.
[snip]
[MLW:]
>> square._x = dates['_' + i]._x + 566;
[snip]
> trans_var = dates._"+i+"._x
That's not what I suggested, and should be a syntax error. I didn't
suggest the following, either:
trans_var = "dates._"+i+"._x"
[OMH:]
>>> If you're trying to assign a property of a variable variable to
>>> another objects property you sure as fuck need it (well in
>>> Actionscript anyway).
>
>> No, you don't.
>
> "Before we begin, I'd like to note that I can't comment with certainty
> on ActionScript "
I have no problem with being wrong regarding ActionScript, assuming for
the moment that I am. After all, I cannot test its treatment of bracket
notation, as I previously wrote, and I don't use it. However, I take it
that your off-hand remark implies that you both: read the material that
I referenced completely and understood it; and you did actually use what
I suggested properly. What you posted above suggests the contrary.
Have you considered contacting Macromedia to inform them that the
documentation about their own language is wrong?
[snip]
Mike
--
Michael Winter
Prefix subject with [News] before replying by e-mail.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|