|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 03/21/06 01:42
With neither quill nor qualm, Adrienne Boswell quothed:
> Gazing into my crystal ball I observed Neredbojias
> <invalid@neredbojias.com> writing in
> news:MPG.1e88b1b1af545bf0989835@news.isp.com:
>
> >> On a technicality... Using frames, and other means, I can instruct
> >> your browser to load someone else's page into a section of one of my
> >> pages. My site however, has not displayed any information from the
> >> third party's site. Your browser, providing it can and does follow
> >> frameset instructions, did the retrieving and displaying. I only
> >> provided a link to the third party's page and instructions on where to
> >> display the content.
> >
>
> Yes, and if the address in the URL bar is http://www.example.com but the
> content is from http://www.microsoft.com and there is nothing stating that
> it _is_ http://www.microsoft.com, then I could be accused of trying to pass
> Micorsoft's content as my own.
Exactly. US copyright-ownership law may (arguably) be too extensive,
but I have no problem with that.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|