|
|
Posted by Bruce Grubb on 04/26/06 23:18
In article <4b86vdF10fh7uU4@individual.net>,
Dave Hinz <DaveHinz@spamcop.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:51:31 +1000, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au>
> wrote:
> > In article <bgrubb-FE4AA9.20315225042006@news.zianet.com>,
> > Bruce Grubb <bgrubb@zianet.com> wrote:
> >
> >> HTML is NOT a page layout format people. The moment you talk about
> >> 'looks'
> >> you are trying to force it into that role and give yourself headaches.
>
> > You are just being silly now. "The moment you talk about
> > 'looks'..." ! You need to step back from jumping to conclusions
> > so easily.
>
> Wow. You're actually for real, aren't you. It's like this caracature
> of someone without the slightest clue or background, it's so _perfect_.
I agree. Also the web is slowly moving from HTML 4.0.1 to XHTML 1.0 which
shoots the whole IE testing idea down. Stuff that HTML 4.0.1 allowed is a
major no no with XHTML 1.0 as they have to be XML conforming. This alone
shows a lot of messing around with the format because now EVERY XML
compliant program in EVERY version must have the same bug as IE for it to
work.
Since some Microsoft program like Excel 2003 support XML how likely is that
going to happen? About the same chances as Apple buying up Microsoft (ie
slim to none).
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|