|
|
Posted by Paul B on 03/08/07 21:17
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:08:50 +1100, dorayme
<doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>In article <8j90v25ljb3lgk97ec5ki2e2flo2jtf8p5@4ax.com>,
> Paul B <customerservices@houstoncrafts.com> wrote:
>
>> >But generally, to make a site from scratch today with transitional either
>> >suggests a lack of experience or confidence
>> >or a special rare good reason.
>>
>> My site was made 3 years ago. Self taught and over 6000 pages. It is
>> used a lot by schools etc, which don't always have the latest browser
>> etc. I've no need to have it as strict, php, cms or any other fancy
>> new idea.
>> It works, why break it ?
>> At least my site will carry on working - THAT'S what matters.
>> Nothing to do with lack of experience or confidence.
>
>This is fairly amazing reasoning.
No it's not.
> I say if you are making a site now... you refer to something made years ago.
No, he stated that dreamweaver users have mistakes in them.
>I say you need a reason if you are making now, ... you go on as if I had not said
>this. And then, for good measure, you create an artificial class
>for polemic reasons:
>Fancy things:
>
>strict doctype
>php
>cms
>other fancy ideas
>6000 pages... mmm. Good for you and all working well. I would not
>dream of telling you to change things unless there was a special
>reason that came up. Don't misunderstand.
I've not misunderstood at all. You make your site the way you want to,
and I will make mine the way I want to. It doesn't hurt the SERPS or
visitors at all.
>Let us step back though. If you were starting the 6000 pages now,
>from scratch, why would you not use a Strict Doctype.
Nope.
> Is it harder to write?
Possibly. I have never tried. Don't want to either. I make sites for
me. I make them for fun, not for business reasons.
>Are you wanting things that are not easily accommodated by Strict?
I think strict is too strict.
> Do you attach great importance to validation?
I think validation is important. But not the most important thing. Out
of the 6000+ pages, there are about 3 or 4 pages that do not validate.
That is because I had different backgrounds and didn't want to bloat
the css any more than need to.
> If a strict does not validate, it may very well still
>work under your idea of work.
It may well do, but am I bothered ?
>Perhaps validation should be one of the members of your "fancy
>things" class?
whatever.
My sites are successful. That's what counts.
--
http://www.firstpeople.us/native-american-art-for-sale/kirby-sattler.html
The amazing artwork of Kirby Sattler.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|