Date: 02/03/07 (Computer Geeks) Keywords: no keywords Many of you know this already, but I'm going to share my recent experiment.
I was expecting the server to do better than the desktop, since it has two Tualatin processors installed (the very last model of Pentium III). Even though the amount of RAM kept it at a very consistent framerate, it was consistently SLOW. Although the PIII server pretty much matched the P4 desktop in 3DMark05 scores, their gaming performances were very different. The notebook got a low 3DMark score but did much better at gaming than the other two computers. This shows that 3DMark does not give a very good indication of gaming performance at all, especially for machines with specs that are fairly comparable. Of course, if the scores are WAY different, then it would be a more trustworthy indicator. Then again, if the difference is that big then there is no need to even benchmark ("Revy", my gaming machine, posts close to 10000 3DMarks- but of course it's going to score higher because the spec is not close enough to these other three machines to be a fair comparison) I think something like PCMark might work as a better indicator, but I have not tried it yet. I think I'll try PCMark, Aquamark, Sysoft Sandra and maybe a few others to see which of them actually match up to the differences in gaming performance. Source: http://community.livejournal.com/computergeeks/1033514.html
|